Is It Time for Caffeine-Free Web Intelligence?

Are you ready for Java-free Web Intelligence?

Apple_iWork_for_iCloud_600

Last week at its World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC), Apple introduced a product that nobody was really anticipating – iWork for iCloud. iWork is Apple’s productivity suite that includes word processing (Pages), spreadsheet (Numbers) and presentation (Keynote) capabilities. Originally designed for the Mac, the apps have also been available on iOS for some time. Later this year, the desktop and mobile apps will be joined by cloud-based siblings, allowing users to access any document from any device (desktop, mobile, web). You can watch the entire WWDC keynote on Apple’s web site.

What was particularly stunning about the WWDC demo were the gorgeous animations and transitions in Keynote, rendered in a web browser without any reliance on plug-ins like Adobe Flash or Oracle Java. iWork for iCloud works on either Macs or PCs with Safari 6.0.3 or later, Chrome 27.0.1 or later, and Internet Explorer 9.0.8 or later.

In a similar way, modern browsers have enabled analytics vendors like Tableau to bring browser-based authoring not only to the desktop but to mobile devices as well (see related article, Tableau 8 Roadshow). If the existence of Tableau 8 and Apple iWork for iCloud isn’t enough proof that the time is right for Java-free Web Intelligence, perhaps the existence of SAP KB 1754269 and SAP KB 1868143 is.

In Apple’s Java plug-in for OS X, for reasons related to platform security, Apple has blocked some of the APIs used by the BI 4.0 Web Intelligence Rich Internet Application (Java Applet). We are working with Apple to design and implement a fix. We plan to deliver a fix in H1 2013.

Web Intelligence relies on Java for many of its advanced features (see related article, The Other Web Intelligence Feature Gap). After being criticized for Java-based security holes, Apple has released new Java updates that have the unfortunate side-effect of crippling Web Intelligence. A difficult spot for a company that appears on SAP’s customer list as well as its supported platforms list.

Even Windows PCs think the Web Intelligence Java Report Panel is unsafe (see my related article on EV Technologies blog, Is Web Intelligence Unsafe?).

Web Intelligence is Potentially Unsafe

I am ready for SAP to deliver 100% SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence with zero plug-ins. I have no inside knowledge that SAP is working toward this goal. But I hope that I’ll see a developer labs preview on the upcoming SAP BusinessObjects User Conference keynote stage.

Resources

  • Vote for Jonathan Haun‘s idea to enhance Web Intelligence for HTML (non-Java version) on SAP Idea Place
  • SAP KB 1930493 – When using the Java viewer or Rich Internet Application for web intelligence with Java 7 update 45, a Java warning pop up appears every time you close it
  • SAP KB 1904873 – Web Intelligence Rich Internet Applet loads slower after installing Java 7 Update 25
  • SAP KB 1899825 – Expired Web Intelligence Java Certificates for SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence 4.0
  • SAP KB 1851792 – In BI 4.x and XI 3.1 when using Java 7 update 21 and Java 6 update 45 when you close the Web Intelligence Rich Internet Application in the browser you will get a prompt to Block unsafe components
  • SAP KB 1754269 – When will Web Intelligence Rich Internet Application support Apple Safari 6 browser?

Are you ready for Java-free Web Intelligence?

Author: Dallas Marks

I am a business intelligence architect, author, and trainer. I help organizations harness the power of analytics, primarily with SAP BusinessObjects products. An active blogger, SAP Mentor and co-author of the SAP Press book SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence: The Comprehensive Guide, I prefer piano keyboards over computer keyboards when not blogging or tweeting about business intelligence.

6 thoughts on “Is It Time for Caffeine-Free Web Intelligence?”

  1. Dallas,

    Does a report designer (who spends hours at a time in the design tool) want to use a browser based tool ? Or would the browser delivery be a better fit for the types of things that an end-user does when viewing a report.

    A couple of reasons I ask :-

    1) You mentioned the animations in Keynote without plug-ins, They do look great but they are a run-time thing really.

    2) I just had a quick go with the web versions of numbers and keynote. It is impressive what that do but I suspect as a heavy user of these I would go a bit nuts trying to use then as a design tool.

    They are great for to do lists or simple ppts but for building a complex financial model or a sophisticated presentation (animations etc) I still think they would frustrate. I love the idea I could deliver them (“run-time”) either myself or to other users over the web, plugin free, but for the core design I think I am very keen to stay in the desktop clients.

    3) I guess that is why given the choice I still use full-client outlook 99% of the time and only drop into the web client (which is also very sophisticated but ultimately frustrating) when I can’t have access to the desktop client

    How about a “proper” desktop version of the designer for professionals and a lighter end-user plug-in-free web version for end-users.

    Having said that I am not sure that WebI is a good place for SAP to spend their investment dollars but that is another story / post !

    Donald

    P.S. What is Apple doing releasing updates to Java 🙂

    1. Donald,

      You’ve raised interesting questions. I hope my readers will chime in with their reactions.

      Some additional thoughts:

      • SAP has spent the last decade convincing customers to migrate from Desktop Intelligence to Web Intelligence. A decade. And that philosophy continues. For example, free-hand SQL support is being added to Web Intelligence 4.2, not some other tool in the suite. There’s been no effort on SAP’s part to reposition, for example, SAP Lumira as the true Desktop Intelligence replacement, complete with migration tools. For these and other reasons, it is important that Web Intelligence continues to delight customers for the next decade. I’m simply stating that continuing to rely on a Java applet for the next decade is a bad idea.
      • Regarding “proper” desktop software vs. the web browser, that’s a highly passionate religious argument for all types of software, not just business intelligence. Customer adoption of the Web Intelligence Rich Client has been chilly. But if browser-based software is “out” and desktop software is back “in”, SAP could do much better than the current desktop application that’s a thinly veiled version of the Java applet I’m arguing to get rid of.
      • For whatever reason, the SAP BusinessObjects user community talked SAP out of rebranding Web Intelligence 4.0 as Interactive Analysis 4.0. Despite the fact that Web Intelligence on an iPad really isn’t “web” anything. So customers continue to like the idea of “web” intelligence. Side note – how would SAP now explain a product named “Interactive Analysis” now that they’re positioning SAP Lumira?
      • One could also argue that migrating from Crystal Reports 2008/2011/2013 to Crystal Reports for Enterprise is a bad investment. But like Web Intelligence, there’s a large amount of Crystal Reports that need to keep running.

      Always a pleasure to hear your thoughts on our industry,
      Dallas

  2. Interesting as always Dallas. I would like to see the dependency on Java removed, at least from the web client.

    And I would argue that even if SAP isn’t positioning Lumira as the Dski replacement, the peg fits the hole – Lumira has better capability than Webi for data acquisition incl JDBC, unv/unx, HANA online etc.

    I see Lumira being the new ‘Swiss-army knife’ that Deski was in its heyday.

    Cheers,

    Josh

Leave a Reply